|
|
| PEM3007 | Environmental Design Projects-IV | 3+4+0 | ECTS:10 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | PEM2016-Envirenmental Design Project III must have been passed | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures and 4 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Arş. Gör. Seyhan SEYHAN | | Co-Lecturer | PROF. DR. BANU ÇİÇEK KURDOĞLU PROF. DR. HABİBE ACAR, PROF. DR. NİLGÜN GÜNEROĞLU PROF. DR. TUĞBA DÜZENLİ PROF. DR. ELİF MERVE ALPAK DOÇ. DR. EMRAH YALÇINALP DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ AYSEL YAVUZ
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ DUYGU AKYOL KUYUMCUOĞLU ARŞ.GÖR.DR. SEYHAN SEYHAN | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The course aims to provide the students with a general knowledge on types of urban open spaces and to help them design urban recreational areas such as city parks, waterfront parks. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | By evaluating the data obtained from site analyses, it will be able to systematically incorporate this into design decisions. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 2 : | Through suggestions, critiques, and sketches during the design process, alternative design solutions can be developed. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 3 : | It will be able to produce functional, aesthetic and user-oriented design solutions for public and semi-public open spaces in line with different age groups, user profiles and needs. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 4 : | The candidate will be able to prepare structural plans, plant plans, sections, elevations, and detail drawings of the study area in accordance with technical drawing principles. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 5 : | They will be able to present design ideas effectively and clearly through models, perspective drawings, layout plans, digital modeling, and other visual presentation techniques. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 6 : | The student will be able to explain the spatial arrangement, circulation system, functional organization, and aesthetic approaches of the designed space by relating them to the design decisions. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | LO - 7 : | Students will be able to express the ecological design decisions made during the design process (plant selection, sustainability, use of natural data, etc.), along with their justifications, using verbal and visual presentation techniques. | 1 - 2 - 3 - 5 | 3,4,5,6, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Literature study about the subject of project (urban park, waterfront park) , Composing an original scenario about the subject, Determining the needs of users depending on the subject, List of user needs, function diagram, need-affordances of project area analysis, Producing the first drafts of spatial organization in light of the previous evaluations and criticizing the produced draftsProposing-criticising draft process till the end of semester Delivering the plan, section, siluette, model representations of design proposal on which consensus was made. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Deciding subject and study area. Model of land topography. | | | Week 2 | Analyzing study area, resource values, possibilities (opportunities) of the area depending on these, literature review about the subject. | | | Week 3 | Determining user needs in relation to subject, list of human needs. Function scheme, needs-possibilities analyze. | | | Week 4 | Developing a scenario in relation to subject, brain storming technique, and thinking with drawing technique. | | | Week 5 | Priorities of function scheme for the given area, drawing the scenario considering area analyzes and needs. Suggestion-criticism. | | | Week 6 | Suggesting designs, developing multiple choices, discussion and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 7 | Suggesting designs and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 8 | Suggesting designs and analyzing the suggested drawings. | | | Week 9 | Discussing and choosing the proposed designs, discussing the chosen designs and the ways to improve them. | | | Week 10 | Theoretical expansion of the subject, preventing deviations from subject, discussing proposed designs. | | | Week 11 | Discussing proposed designs. Attaining a certain level at plan presentations. | | | Week 12 | Analyzing sections and siluettes, developing proposals, discussion and concluding, section and plan relationship. | | | Week 13 | Improving sections, discussion of details, checking plan-section and siluettes in relation to each other, feed back. | | | Week 14 | Checking the project as a whole; plans, sections, siluettes, details and model. | | | Week 15 | Preparing the final project, however, anyone who need can ask for correction. | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Hannebaum, L. G., 2001; Landscape Design: A Practical Approach (5th edition), Prentice Hall | | | |
| 1 | Hong Kong Rihan International Culture Co. 2007; Landscape Blackbooks, Ginkgo Press | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | End-of-term exam | 15 | 29/12/2017 | 276 | 100 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 6 | 14 | 84 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 15 | 14 | 210 | | Uygulama | 4 | 14 | 56 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 15 | 2 | 30 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Total work load | | | 384 |
|