|
|
| PEM1003 | Drawing Techniques | 2+2+0 | ECTS:8 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures and 2 hours of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Serap YILMAZ | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | To teach students perspective techniques and types and to provide the student with them modelling techniques at various scales. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | learn the basic concepts related perspective and mode techniques | 1,3 | 1 | | LO - 2 : | perceive three dimensional objects | 2,3 | 4 | | LO - 3 : | develop or bring our existing abilities. | 4 | 5 | | LO - 4 : | gain the ability to present. | 4,5 | 5 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Perspective techniques and types. Parallel perspective, conic perspective, visual ray method, one and two vanishing point perspectives. Drawing platform at different level road ramps, stairs and plants components of perspectives. Modelling techniques at various scales. Modelling to different land form. Modelling to various types? plants and all main urban furniture
|
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Course Content | | | Week 2 | The Basic Concepts Related Perspective and Model Techniques | | | Week 3 | Two and Three Dimensional Perception | | | Week 4 | Technical Presentation Skills | | | Week 5 | To Practice on Free Hand and Rule-based Drawing Methods | | | Week 6 | Towards Developing Their Understanding of Means of Presentation; Report, Drawing, Model | | | Week 7 | Three Dimensional Perception of Pre-existing or Self-designed Objects | | | Week 8 | Self-designed Objects | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Three Dimensional Perception of Pre-existing | | | Week 11 | Student Presentations | | | Week 12 | Student Presentations | | | Week 13 | Student Presentations | | | Week 14 | Student Presentations | | | Week 15 | The ability to Present | | | Week 16 | Final exam | | | |
| 1 | Zell, Mo. 2008; The Architectural Rdawing Course, Thomas and Hudson, 143 p., China | | | 2 | Gruzdys, S. 2002; Drawing, The Creative Link, Architectural Record, Vo.190, No 1, p.64-67, New York | | | 3 | Ching, F. 1997; Design Drawing, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 272 p., New York | | | 4 | Akgün, M. 2004; Mimari Çizim Tekniği, Birsen Yayınevi, 274 s., İstanbul | | | |
| 1 | Akgün, M. 2003; Mimari Maketler, Birsen Yayınevi, 231 s., İstanbul | | | 2 | Uzun, G. 1990; Peyzaj Mimarlığında Perspektif, Model ve Çizim Tekniği, Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 38, Ç.Ü.Z.F.Ofset ve Teksir Atölyesi, 151 s., Adana | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 2013 | 4,00 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 2013 | 4,00 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 6 | 1 | 6 | | Arasınav | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Uygulama | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 8 | 1 | 8 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 4 | 1 | 4 | | Diğer 1 | 4 | 3 | 12 | | Diğer 2 | 5 | 2 | 10 | | Total work load | | | 100 |
|