|
|
| JFZ3002 | Electric-Electromagnetic Prospecting | 2+1+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures and 1 hour of practicals per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Özlem HACIOĞLU | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | It is assumed that students have knowledge of Mathematics, Physics, and geology. The course aims to provide students understand the physical principles used in electromagnetic (EM) methods, to teach to design EM techniques to achieve specific exploration objectives, to teach them how to write computer programs to model the geophysical responses measured in EM techniques, to teach them how to process and interpretation of EM field data. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | design electrical geophysical surveys and adapt techniques to achieve specific exploration objectives | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,3 | | LO - 2 : | write computer programs to model the geophysical responses measured in a variety of electrical techniques | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,3 | | LO - 3 : | process and invert a variety of electrical geophysical measurements into their causative. earth models | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,3 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Conductivity properties of the geological targets. Principles of the electromagnetic (EM) wave propagation. Dip angle method. Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic (Slingram) Method. Transient EM (TEM) method. VLF EM method. Magneto telluric (MT) fields and origin of telluric currents. Field examples of EM methods for mineral, groundwater, environmental surveys. Airborne EM. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Geoelectrical Methods, clasification of the methods and general interpretation approaches. | | | Week 2 | Electrical resistivity methods; interpretaion of horizontal profiling field data. | | | Week 3 | Interpretaion of horizontal profiling field data, field examples. | | | Week 4 | Forward modelling, interpretation of Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) data by lineer filters. | | | Week 5 | Direct interpretation methods. | | | Week 6 | 2-Dimensional modelling of electrical resistivity data, field examples. | | | Week 7 | 2-Dimensional modelling of electrical resistivity data, field examples. | | | Week 8 | Complex resistivity measurements. Interpretation of Induced Polarisation (IP) data. 2-D modelling | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Interpretation of Induced Polarisation (IP) data. 2-D modelling. | | | Week 11 | Self-potential (SP) method. SP field procedures and interpretation of SP data. | | | Week 12 | Telluric amd magnetotelluric methods and interpretation of field data. | | | Week 13 | Electromagnetic (EM) Methods. Frequency and time domain EM. Interpretation of Very Low Frequency (VLF) field data. | | | Week 14 | Interpretation of phase component measurements. | | | Week 15 | Interpretation of phase component measurements. Airborne EM | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Telford W.M. et al, 1990, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press. | | | 2 | Parasnis, D.S., 1986, Principles of Applied Geophysics, 4th edition, Chapman and Hall, London. | | | |
| 1 | Ward, S.H., 1992, Resistivity and Induced Polarisation Methods, Investigation in Geophysics No.5, SEG, Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Edited by Stanley H. Ward, pp. 147-189. | | | 2 | Bertin, J. and Loeb, J., 1976, Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Induced Polarisation, Geoexploration Monographs, Vol. 1 and 2, Gebrüder, Borntraeger, Berlin. | | | 3 | Koefoed, O., 1979, Geosounding Principles, Elsevier, N.Y. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | | 2 | 35 | | Presentation | 15 | | 1 | 15 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 10 | 1 | 10 | | Arasınav | 1 | 2 | 2 | | Uygulama | 1 | 14 | 14 | | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Ödev | 4 | 10 | 40 | | Proje | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 15 | 1 | 15 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Total work load | | | 153 |
|