|
|
| JFZ3011 | Gravity forward solution | 2+0+0 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | Doç. Dr. Ali ELMAS | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Students gain the ability work can be tested the 2D and 3D gravity model straight solution published in national and international journals (SCI). |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | design gravity and magnetic geophysical surveys and adapt techniques to achieve specific exploration objectives | 2,5 | | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| 2B gravity calculations reminder algorithms described previously. Synthetic model of the same 2D geometry algorithms gravities calculated separately, comparison and explanation of a similar status or lack of. The geometry and density of the same model according to the definitions defined in many different ways to formulate. Comparison of result. Result from the disclosure of the effects of differences in left and right border. Technique is the definition of the ideal model geometry. It is very different gravity anomaly expression and function of calculating the constant role of these definitions. Elimination of the effects of the border. The effect of the inversion results of the expense accounts |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Basic knowledge about 2D solution | | | Week 2 | To reminder for the straight solution algorithms of various gravity | | | Week 3 | 2D synthetic model defining the geometry of the formations in many different ways. So as to eliminate the effects of the border as the ideal technique for the definition of the 2D model geometry. | | | Week 4 | 2D synthetic model defining the geometry of the formations in many different ways. So as to eliminate the effects of the border as the ideal technique for the definition of the 2D model geometry.
| | | Week 5 | Whether the adoption of these different gravities formulate definitions, calculation of the appropriate density of the formations. | | | Week 6 | Whether the adoption of these different gravities formulate definitions, calculation of the appropriate density of the formations.
| | | Week 7 | Calculates the comparison of these results on the influence of the destruction and the effects of boundary formation. | | | Week 8 | Calculated gravity values shown in different places, and this situation arises from the effects of the inverse limit disclosure of the important role of accounts | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | In the same way, the different models of gravity or geoid differences in the definitions of geometry only, and it is an indicator function of a fixed inversion is insignificant disclosure of accounts | | | Week 11 | For comparison at the results continue to be versatile and made detailed explanatory information necessary to give additional accounts | | | Week 12 | SCI journals flat 2D-gravity studies to test the solution, digitization of the model geometry.
| | | Week 13 | Running 2D gravity or geoid using the given values of density calculations | | | Week 14 | To be different in order to compare results and to investigate the reasons for such Relieving. | | | Week 15 | In the absence of compliance, the authors will go directly to the question of the causes of the preparation of the report | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Çavşak, H., Basılmamış Ders Notlar, KTÜ, Trabzon. | | | 2 | Jacoby, W.R., Smilde, P., 2009 Gravity Interpretation: Fundamentals and Application of Gravity Inversion and Geological Interpretation, Springer, US. | | | 3 | Telfort, W.M., et all., 1991, Applied Geophysics | | | 4 | Friedrich, B., et all., 1985, Angewandte Geowissenschaften | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 19/11/2013 | 2 | 50 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 12/01/2013 | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 6 | 1 | 6 | | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Uygulama | 1 | 14 | 14 | | Ödev | 1 | 4 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 10 | 1 | 10 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 122 |
|