|
|
| EEE3010 | Automatic Control Systems | 3+0+2 | ECTS:5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of ELECTRICAL and ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures and 2 hours of laboratory per week | | Lecturer | Doç. Dr. Mustafa Şinasi AYAS | | Co-Lecturer | Assis. Prof. Yeşim Aysel BAYSAL ASLANHAN | | Language of instruction | | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The aim of the course is to provide students with basic knowledge and skills in modelling, analysis and control of dynamic systems. The course aims to enable students to understand and apply various control strategies to linear time-invariant systems, to evaluate system stability and to design different types of controllers. |
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | perform examples from all topics in Matlab/Simulink environment. | 1,2,4,5 | 4, | | LO - 2 : | Have sufficient information on stability of LTI systems and make the analsis b using Routh Hurwitz criterion. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | LO - 3 : | Have sufficient knowledge on stability, sensitivity, tracking and disturbance rejection of Open and closed loop systems for design and analysis. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | LO - 4 : | Learn and utilize the structural properties of feedforward and feedback controllers. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | LO - 5 : | have the sufficient knowledge to analyse typical feedback controllers such as proportional (P), proportional and integral (PI), proportional, integral and derivative (PID), variants of PID, lead and lag compensators, state-feedback controller and state-feedback with integral action. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | LO - 6 : | Analyse and design the control systems by root locus. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | LO - 7 : | Analyse and desgn control systems in frequency domain by using Nyquist criterion and Bode plots. | 1,2,4,5 | 1,4, | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Modelling and analysis of physical systems in time and frequency domains, stability of control systems, Ruoth-Hurwitz stability test, feed forward and feedback controllers, analysis and design of PID controllers, analysis and design with root locus graphs, Bode diagrams, Nyquist diagrams, Bode and Nyquist stability criteria, relative and absolute stability, design in time and frequency domains, performance measures in control systems, introduction to optimal control systems, computer simulations related to all topics. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Overview of mathematical and simulation models of systems: differential equations, equations of state, transfer functions and simulation diagrams. | | | Week 2 | Stability in control systems: Definition and brief review of the Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion | | | Week 3 | Stability analysis with Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion | | | Week 4 | Feed-forward control structure, typical feedback controllers (on-off, P, I PI)
| | | Week 5 | Typical feedback controllers (PD, PID, state feedback controller, phase lead/lagd compensator) | | | Week 6 | Root locus graphs | | | Week 7 | Phase lead/lag compensator design with root locus | | | Week 8 | Closed loop frequency response and its relationship with open loop frequency response: Bode diagrams | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Closed loop frequency response and its relationship with open loop frequency response: Nyquist diagrams | | | Week 11 | Design principles in time domain | | | Week 12 | Design principles in frequency domain, Phase leas compensator design | | | Week 13 | Design principles in frequency domain, Phase lag compensator design | | | Week 14 | Performance metrics in control systems | | | Week 15 | Overview of optimal control | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Altaş, İ.H., Ders sunum notları, Basılmamış, KTÜ | | | |
| 1 | Franklin, G.F., Powell, J.D. and Emani-Naemi, A., 2006; Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. Prentice-Hall. | | | 2 | Dorf, R.C. and Bishop, R.H., 2001; Modern Control Systems, Prentice Hall Inc. | | | 3 | Ogata, K., 1997; Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall. | | | 4 | Kuo, B.J., 1995; Automatic Control Systems, Prentice Hall. | | | 5 | Nise, N.S., 2004; Control Systems Engineering, 4th Edition, Wiley. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | | 2 | 30 | | Laboratory exam | 4-14 | | 2 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | | 2 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 10 | 20 | | Laboratuar çalışması | 2 | 10 | 20 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 2 | 7 | 14 | | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 2 | 5 | 10 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Total work load | | | 110 |
|