|
|
| IMBL5293 | Ergonomics in Interior | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | | Year / Semester | Spring Semester | | Level of Course | Second Cycle | | Status | Elective | | Department | DEPARTMENT of INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face, Group study, Practical | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | | Lecturer | -- | | Co-Lecturer | | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | Depending on the purpose and scope of the definition of ergonomics, the process of learning and development are taught in Turkey. Thus, the interior design of the place and importance of the discipline of ergonomics to reveal the ergonomic arrangement of the physical environment with the principles of the anthropometric, physiological, spatial, psychological, information and safety is to be told. |
| Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | PO - 1 : | Depending on the purpose and scope of the definition of ergonomics learn the historical process. | 1,2,5 | 1,3 | | PO - 2 : | Comprehend in detail the relationship between space and ergonomics. | 1,2,5 | 3,5 | | PO - 3 : | Anthropometric, physiological, spatial, psychological, information and safety comprehend the importance of the link between the space with ergonomic design principles. | 1,2,5 | 5,6 | | PO - 4 : | All the principles of ergonomic regulation will be discussed in different interior examples. | 1,2,5 | 3,5,6 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Which is one of the most important factors in the design of interior spaces under the heading of ergonomics, ergonomics definition, ergonomics, depending on the purpose and importance of history is revealed. Ergonomic design principles as under the headings of the anthropometric, physiological, spatial, psychological, safety and information explaining the effects of the design of the interior spaces examples are put forward on the discussion. |
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Ergonomics Definition, Purpose and Scope | | | Week 2 | Emergence of ergonomics and Historical Development | | | Week 3 | Development of ergonomics in the world and in Turkey | | | Week 4 | The Importance of Ergonomics in the Design of Space | | | Week 5 | Physical Environment Ergonomic principles of Regulation | | | Week 6 | Regulatory Aspects of anthropometric | | | Week 7 | Regulatory Aspects of Physiology | | | Week 8 | Regulatory Aspects of Spatial | | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 10 | Regulatory Aspects of Psychological | | | Week 11 | Regulatory Aspects of Information | | | Week 12 | Regulatory Aspects of Safety | | | Week 13 | Field work, different types of space ergonomic formations | | | Week 14 | Field work, different types of space ergonomic formations | | | Week 15 | Field work, different types of space ergonomic formations | | | Week 16 | Final exam | | | |
| 1 | Ertaş, Ş., 2012. Çocuk ve Spor İlişkisi Üzerine Fiziksel Biçimlenmeyi Etkileyen Ergonomik Faktörlere Dayalı Bir Model, Doktora Tezi, KTU Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. | | | |
| 1 | Kroemer KHE., Kroemer HB. ve Kroemer-Elbert KE., 1994. Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, NJ : Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. | | | 2 | HFES,1999. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Strategic Plan, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Directory and Yaerbook 1999-2000, 389, Santa Monica. | | | 3 | Hoke, J. R., 1994. Architectural Graphic Standards, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. | | | 4 | Hendrıck, H. W., 1991. Human Factors in Organizasional Design and Management, Ergonomics, Vol 4. | | | 5 | Toka, C., 1978. İnsan-Araç Bağıntısında Ergonomik Tasarım İlkeleri, İstanbul Devlet Güzel Sanatlar Akademisi, Yayın No:73, İstanbul. | | | 6 | Proctor, R. W. ve Van Zandt, T., 1994 . Human factors in simple and complex systems, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 9 | 10/04/2019 | 3 | 30 | | Presentation | 14 | | 2 | 10 | | Homework/Assignment/Term-paper | 15 | | 2 | 10 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 01/05/2019 | 3 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 8 | 5 | 40 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 6 | 2 | 12 | | Arasınav | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Uygulama | 10 | 2 | 20 | | Ödev | 3 | 2 | 6 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 10 | 8 | 80 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 3 | 1 | 3 | | Total work load | | | 206 |
|