|
JFZL7220 | Use of Geophysical Methods in Construction | 3+0+0 | ECTS:7.5 | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | Level of Course | Third Cycle | Status | Elective | Department | DEPARTMENT of GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERING | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | Mode of Delivery | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 3 hours of lectures per week | Lecturer | Prof. Dr. Aysel ŞEREN | Co-Lecturer | none | Language of instruction | Turkish | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | The aim of the course: | Importance of geophysical engineering methods used the upper structure researches and its practices is emphasize. To determine of quality of engineering structures with non-destructive techniques. |
Programme Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | PO - 1 : | learn geophysical methods used in engineering structures | 2,4 | 1,5 | PO - 2 : | Learn to evaluation and interpretation with computer programs of geophysical data, taken in historical structures and buildings. | 2,4 | 1,5 | PO - 3 : | learn the relationships with other disciplines of construction geophysics studies | 2,4 | 1,5 | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), PO : Learning Outcome | |
To reveal internal structure of elements of construction. The non-destructive measurement methods in used Geophysics (Ground penetrating radar (GPR), ultrasonic, electrical resistivity and micro seismic) and its applications. Determination of location of reinforcing bars in concrete with GPR method. Estimation of corrosion with electrical resistivity method. Reveal the quality of the concrete by the help of Ultrasonic and micro-seismic Determination of the effect of earthquake on engineering structures. Examination of case studies such as buildings, bridge, historical buildings by using geophysical methods. |
|
Course Syllabus | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | Week 1 | Introduction | | Week 2 | Geophysics in the construction sector | | Week 3 | Reveal the problems encountered in buildings | | Week 4 | Geophysical methods applied to engineering structures | | Week 5 | Micro-seismic and ultrasonic method | | Week 6 | Ground penetrating radar | | Week 7 | Electrical resistivity method | | Week 8 | Microtremor method | | Week 9 | Mid-term exam | | Week 10 | Determination of cracks and gaps in the concrete | | Week 11 | Calculation of locations of the reinforcement and cover in concrete | | Week 12 | Calculating the probability of corrosion and moisture content with resistivity method | | Week 13 | Determination of the dominant vibration period of the buildings | | Week 14 | Geophysical studies and its applications in buildings, bridges and tunnels,
Presentations | | Week 15 | Examination of the material properties and strength of the historical structures,
Presentations | | Week 16 | Final Exam | | |
1 | Nazarian, S and Dieh, J. 2000. Use of Geophysical Methods in Construction, Geotechnical Special Publications. ISBN-13: 978-0784405215. | | 2 | Kurtuluş, C. ve Bozkurt, A. 2007. Jeofizik Yöntemlerle Yer ve Yapı İncelemeleri, İzmit. | | 3 | Ercan, A., 2003. Yapı İnceleme Yöntemleri, Mühendislik Jeofiziği Dizisi-II, Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul. | | |
Method of Assessment | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | Mid-term exam | 9 | | 2 | 25 | Project | 15 | | 1 | 25 | End-of-term exam | 16 | | 2 | 50 | |
Student Work Load and its Distribution | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 3 | 14 | 42 | Laboratuar çalışması | 2 | 3 | 6 | Arasınav için hazırlık | 15 | 1 | 15 | Arasınav | 2 | 1 | 2 | Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | Klinik Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 | Proje | 30 | 3 | 90 | Kısa sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 20 | 1 | 20 | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 1 | 2 | Diğer 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Diğer 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Total work load | | | 219 |
|