|
|
| MDM3033 | Mechanization in Mine and Tunnel Excavations | 2+0+1 | ECTS:4 | | Year / Semester | Fall Semester | | Level of Course | First Cycle | | Status | Compulsory | | Department | DEPARTMENT of MINING ENGINEERING | | Prerequisites and co-requisites | None | | Mode of Delivery | Face to face | | Contact Hours | 14 weeks - 2 hours of lectures and 1 hour of laboratory per week | | Lecturer | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Serkan İNAL | | Co-Lecturer | None | | Language of instruction | Turkish | | Professional practise ( internship ) | None | | | | The aim of the course: | | The purpose of the course are classification of rock cutting tools, theoretical calculation of cutter forces, investigation of cutting theories, the comparison of theoretical and experimental values.
|
| Learning Outcomes | CTPO | TOA | | Upon successful completion of the course, the students will be able to : | | | | LO - 1 : | learn, understand and effective cominucation of the fundamental concepts of excavation of rock and coal | 1.2 - 2.2 - 4.2 - 5.2 | 1 | | LO - 2 : | investigate of rock cutting tools able to choice rock cutting tools according to different kind of geological formation | 1.2 - 2.2 - 4.2 - 5.2 | 1 | | LO - 3 : | learn theoretical calculation of cutter forces in relieved and unrelieved cutting, Evans, Nishimatsu and Merchant Potts theories | 1.2 - 2.2 - 4.2 - 5.2 | 1 | | LO - 4 : | learn fundemantal design of cutter head with the aid of cutting theories | 1.2 - 2.2 - 4.2 - 5.2 | 1 | | LO - 5 : | present before an audience the results and outcome of any exercise | 1.2 - 2.2 - 4.2 - 5.2 | 1 | | CTPO : Contribution to programme outcomes, TOA :Type of assessment (1: written exam, 2: Oral exam, 3: Homework assignment, 4: Laboratory exercise/exam, 5: Seminar / presentation, 6: Term paper), LO : Learning Outcome | | |
| Classification of rock cutting tools, chisel picks, conical cutters, disc cutters. Dependent and independent variables in rock cutting. Theoretical calculation of cutter forces in relieved and unrelieved cutting, Evans, Nishimatsu and Merchant ? Potts theories. The comparison of theoretical and experimental values. Empirical equations for estimation of cutter forces. Design of cutter heads with the aid of cutting theories. Wear of cutting tools and its effect on machine performance.
|
| |
| Course Syllabus | | Week | Subject | Related Notes / Files | | Week 1 | Ofiical holdiday | | | Week 2 | Drag tools | | | Week 3 | Drag tools | | | Week 4 | Disc cutters | | | Week 5 | hobnail cutters | | | Week 6 | Mechanized wells and tunneling | | | Week 7 | Mechanized wells and tunneling | | | Week 8 | Mid-term exam | | | Week 9 | Determination of rocks excavability | | | Week 10 | Determination of rocks excavability | | | Week 11 | Determination of rocks excavability | | | Week 12 | Hydraulic breakers | | | Week 13 | midterm 2 | | | Week 14 | Hydraulic breakers | | | Week 15 | General evaluation | | | Week 16 | End-of-term exam | | | |
| 1 | Bilgin, N., 1989; İnşaat ve Maden Mühendisleri için Uygulamalı Kazı Mekaniği. Birsen Yayınevi, ISBN 97S-Sl1-O10-0, İstanbul | | | 2 | Hartman, H.L.1992; SME Mining Engineering Handbook. 2nd Edition. AIME-Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration. ISBN 0873335-100-2,USA | | | |
| 1 | Wagner, H. and A Schulter, 1996; Tunnel Boring Machines? Trends in Design and Construction of Mechanized Tunneling. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 0905410/G 08118, pp. 263 | | | |
| Method of Assessment | | Type of assessment | Week No | Date | Duration (hours) | Weight (%) | | Mid-term exam | 8 | 10-NOV-09 | 1,5 | 30 | | In-term studies (second mid-term exam) | 13 | 15/11/2009 | 1,5 | 20 | | End-of-term exam | 16 | 04-JAN-10 | 1,5 | 50 | | |
| Student Work Load and its Distribution | | Type of work | Duration (hours pw) | No of weeks / Number of activity | Hours in total per term | | Yüz yüze eğitim | 3 | 14 | 42 | | Sınıf dışı çalışma | 2 | 14 | 28 | | Arasınav için hazırlık | 2 | 8 | 16 | | Arasınav | 2 | 3 | 6 | | Kısa sınav | 1 | 4 | 4 | | Dönem sonu sınavı için hazırlık | 3 | 8 | 24 | | Dönem sonu sınavı | 2 | 3 | 6 | | Total work load | | | 126 |
|